Bigfoot it always stays outside the range of scientific proof

My comments

The article notes that Bigfoot and Sasquatch are terms for the same creature. One thing that stands out is the number of Bigfoot seen. It's a high enough number to indicate that the Bigfoot is not on the edge of extinction and yet it raises the question why, if there are so many of them, is their still no concrete evidence of their existence?

I am not aware of any high quality, clearly not fake photos. I don't think any obvious Bigfoot skeletons have been found although this assumes that the skeletons of 'giants' that have been found could have been Bigfoot since the Bigfoot are generally a few feet taller than a normal human.

The article notes that mainstream scientists say there is no such thing, period. The Bigfoot does fall under the 'extraordinary claims need extraordinary proof' approach, though.

The article notes the smell of rotton eggs or sulpur from the Bigfoot. Of all the times I have seen such a statement made I have yet to find one single time where anyone explains just why they small that way.

Main Index Page

Other Books Index Page