Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, Tuesday May 17, 2022. U.S. House of Representatives.

Permanent Select Comjmittee on Intelligence, Subcommittee of Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence and Counterproliferation.

These are some of the main things in the report.

The report discusses Project Blue Book a little. Then later came the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchonization Group.

It says that UAPs are a potential national security threat. This I find interesting and may be something done on purpose by renaming things to slowly move the government into admitting that such things as UFOs/UAPs actually exist.

Importantly it notes the stigma attached to those who report and investigation UFOs/UAPs. This is something that I have seen mentioned over and over in various articles of UFOs/UAPs.

Very interestingly the report says that that last time Congress took place over 50 years ago. (Yes, indeed, the government sometimes moves slowly than a comatose snail.)

It notes that even pilots have been victims of stigma when reporting UFO/UAP sightings. It says UAP reports have been around for decades but there is no orderly way for them to be reported without stigma being assigned to the person reporting it.

It also points out that it's important to note that UFOs and UAPs have been detected by various instruments (so it's not imaginary.)

It defines a UAP as 'airborne objcts that, when encountered, cannot be immediately identified.'

It notes UAPs have been seen by service personnel. It says UAPs '...pose potential flight safety and general security.''

It says there is also a 'cultural stigma' related to reporting UAPs.

It says the department is committed to 'the principle of openness and accountability to the American people.'

"Since he early 2020's we have seen an increasing number of unauthorized and/or unidentified aircraft or objects in military-controlled training areas and training ranges and other designated airspace.'

This is at leaast partially due to new detection systems and less of a stigma for reporting sightings.

Incursions in training areas can become hazards to safety of flight.

'From the very beginning we took these reports very seriously.' That might and might not be true.

Navy and Air Force crews now have a step-by-step process to report UAPs.

Possible explantions for UAPs are airborne clutter, natural atmospheric phenomena, government or industry development programs, foreign adversary systems and other things.

If UAPs do represent a potential threat then the various sytems used to monitor them need to be classified at appropriate levels.

'...public disclosures must be carefully considered on a case-by-case basis.

'...the executive branch in administrations, both parties, have been sweeping concerns about UAPs under the rug by focusing on events that can be explained and avoiding events that cannot be explained.'

They are trying to establishs a standardized method of dealing with UAPs which is an extremely excellent idea if they can achive it.

'...we are open to all hypotheses. We are open to any conclusions that we may encounter.'

There is a very strong emphasis in this report on the need to protect aviators, observers and so on and make sure they are safe.

'The inability to understand objects in our sensistive operating areas is tantamount to an intelligence failure that we certainly want to avoid.'

Here there is a problem in that the committee is assuming we can understand what is happening but it's possible that what we are dealing with is simply beyond our comprehension at the present time with our level of technological understanding.

The committee says that if an aviator has a sighting the first thing they should do upon landing is report to an intelligence officer. Then they need to fill out a form on all the details of their observation. One copy would go to the operational unit and the other copy would go to the UAP task force.

The reort would then go into a database for analysis.

There are no adversaries that as far as what is known have the same ablilities as the UFOs/UAPs.

'...it is clear that many of the observatoins we have are physical objects from the sensor data that we do have.'

'China has established its own version of the UAP task force.'

This is very important since it proves that the UAPs are a world-wide phenomena.

Then the report discusses the stigma problem in reporting so more.

One of the people testifying says "When it comesto material that we have, we have no material.' In other words, no UFO crash material and no alien bodies.

There is a reference to a specific sighting where in which '...ten of our nuclear ICBMs were rendered inoperable. At the same time a glowing red orb was observed overhead.'

One person reports there have been no collisons between UAPs and U.S. 'assets' (planes, etc.) but there have been 11 near misses.

There have been no communication with any of the UFOs/UAPs.

In reference to saucer crashes: 'The UAP teask force doesn't have any wreckage that isn't explainable...'

What is also very interesting in that some things are being reserved for closed sessions. Very interesting.

The report also discusses disinformation and self-serving information. The committee is told that no one has been held accountable for doing either thing.

Some of the objects might be drones that can disable 'our' systems and thus they are dangerous.

Main Index Page

Other Books Index Page