THE WITCHCRAFT DELUSION IN COLONIAL CONNECTICUT; 1647-1697;
BY JOHN M. TAYLOR; 1908
Katherine Harrison
An accusation of witchcraft was a serious matter, one of life or death, and often it was safer to become an
accuser than one of the accused. Made in terror, malice, mischief, revenge, or religious dementia, or of some
other ingredients in the Devil's brew, it passed through the stages of suspicion, espionage, watchings, and
searchings, to the formal complaints and indictments which followed the testimony of the witnesses, in their
madness and delusion hot-foot to tell the story of their undoing, their grotesque imaginings, their spectral
visions, their sufferings at the hands of Satan and his tools, and all aimed at people, their neighbors and
acquaintances, often wholly innocent, but having marked personal peculiarities, or of irregular lives by the
Puritan standard, or unpopular in their communities, who were made the victim of one base passion or another
and brought to trial for a capital offense against person and property.
Taking into account the actual number of accusations, trials, and convictions or acquittals, the number of
witnesses called and depositions given was very great. And the later generations owe their opportunity to
judge aright in the matter, to the foresight of the men of chief note in the communities who saw the vital
necessity of record evidence, and so early as 1666, in the General Court of Connecticut, it was ordered that
Whatever testimonies are improved in any court of justice in this corporation in any action or case to be
tried, shall be presented in writing, and so kept by the secretary or clerk of the said court on file.
KATHERINE (KATERAN) HARRISON
At a Court of Assistants held at Hartford May 11, 1669, presided over by Maj. John Mason—the
conqueror of the Pequots—then Deputy Governor, Katherine Harrison, after an examination by the court on a
charge of suspicion of witchcraft, was committed to the common jail, to be kept in durance until she came to
trial and deliverance by the law.
At an adjourned session of the court at Hartford, May 25, 1669, presided over by John Winthrop,
Governor, with William Leete, Deputy Governor, Major Mason and others as assistants, an indictment was
found against the prisoner in these words:
Kateran Harrison thou standest here indicted by ye name of Kateran Harrison (of Wethersfield) as being
guilty of witchcraft for that thou not haueing the fear of God before thine eyes hast had familiaritie with
Sathan the grand enemie of god and mankind and by his help hast acted things beyond and beside the ordinary
course of nature and hast thereby hurt the bodyes of divers of the subjects of or souraigne Lord the King of
which by the law of god and of this corporation thou oughtest to dye.
Katherine plead not guilty and refered herself to a tryall by the jury present, to whom this solemn oath
was administered:
You doe sware by the great and dreadful name of the everliuing god that you will well and truely try just
verdict give and true deliverance make between or Souraigne Lord the King and such prisoner or prisoners at
the barr as shall be given you in charge according to the Evidence given in Court and the lawes so help you
god in or lord Jesus.
A partial trial was had at the May session of the court, but the jury could not agree upon a verdict, and
adjournment was had until the October session, when a verdict was to be given in, and the prisoner was
remanded to remain in prison in the meantime.
It seems incredible that men like Winthrop and Mason, Treat and Leete, and others of the foremost rank in
those days, could have served as judges in such trials, and in all earnestness and sincerity listened to and given
credence to the drivel, the travesties of common sense, the mockeries of truth, which fell from the lips of the
witnesses in their testimonies. Some of the absurd charges against Katherine Harrison invite particular
attention and need no comment. They speak for themselves.
Accusers
THOMAS BRACY (probably Tracy)
Thomas Bracy aged about 31 years testifieth as follows that formerly James Wakeley would haue
borrowed a saddle of the saide Thomas Bracy, which Thomas Bracy denyed to lend to him, he threatened
Thomas and saide, it had bene better he had lent it to him. Allsoe Thomas Bracy beinge at worke the same day
making a jacket &a paire of breeches, he labored to his best understanding to set on the sleeues aright on the
jacket and seauen tymes he placed the sleues wronge, setting the elbow on the wronge side and was faine to
rip them of and new set them on againe, and allsoe the breeches goeing to cut out the breeches, haueing two
peices of cloth of different collors, he was soe bemoydered in the matter, that he cut the breeches one of one
collor the other off another collor, in such a manner he was bemoydered in his understandinge or actinge yet
neuertheless the same daie and tyme he was well in his understandinge and health in other matters and soe
was forced to leaue workinge that daie.
The said Thomas beinge at Sargant Hugh Wells his house ouer against John Harrison's house, in
Weathersfield, he saw a cart cominge towards John Harrisons house loaden wth hay, on the top of the hay he
saw perfectly a red calfes head, the eares standing peart up, and keeping his sight on the cart tell the cart came
to the barne, the calfe vanised, and Harrison stoode on the carte wch appared not to Thomas before, nor could
Thomas find or see any calfe theire at all though he sought to see the calfe.
After this Thomas Bracy giuing out some words, that he suspected Katherin Gooddy Harrison of
witchcraft, Katherin Harrison mett Thomas Bracy and threatned Thomas telling him that shee would be euen
with him. After that Thomas Bracy aforesaide, being well in his sences &health and perfectly awake, his
brothers in bed with him, Thomas aforesaid saw the saide James Wakely and the saide Katherin Harrison
stand by his bed side, consultinge to kill him the said Thomas, James Wakely said he would cut his throate,
but Katherin counselled to strangle him, presently the said Katherin seised on Thomas striuinge to strangle
him, and pulled or pinched him so as if his flesh had been pulled from his bones, theirefore Thomas groaned.
At length his father Marten heard and spake, then Thomas left groninge and lay quiet a little, and then
Katherin fell againe to afflictinge and pinching, Thomas againe groninge Mr. Marten heard and arose and
came to Thomas whoe could not speake till Mr. Marten laid his hands on Thomas, then James and Katherin
aforesaid went to the beds feete, his father Marten and his mother stayed watchinge by Thomas all that night
after, and the next day Mr. Marten and his wife saw the mark of the saide afflictinge and pinchinge.
Dated 13th of August one thousand six hundred sixtie and eight.
RICHARD MOUNTAGUE
Richard Mountague, aged 52 years, testifieth as followeth, that meeting with Goodwife Harrison in
Weathersfield the saide Katherin Harrison saide that a swarm of her beese flew away over her neighbour
Boreman's lott and into the great meadow, and thence over the greate river to Nabuck side, but the said
Katherin saide that shee had fetched them againe; this seemed very strange to the saide Richard, because this
was acted in a little tyme and he did believe the said Katherin neither went nor used any lawful meanes to
fetch the said beese as aforesaid. Dated the 13 of August, 1668. Hadley, taken upon oath before us, Henry
Clarke, Samuel Smith. Exhibited in Court, October 29: 68, as attests John Allyn Secretry.
JOANE FRANCIS
Joane Francis her testimony. About 4 years ago, about the beginning of November, in the night just
before my child was struck ill, goodwife Harrison or her shape appeared, and I said, the Lord bless me and my
child, here is goody Harrison. And the child lying on the outside I took it and laid it between me and my
husband. The child continued strangely ill about three weeks, wanting a day, and then died, had fits. We felt a
thing run along the sides or side like a whetstone. Robert Francis saith he remembers his wife said that night
the child was taken ill, the Lord bless me and my child, here is goody Harrison.
MARY HALE
That about the latter end of November, being the 29th day, 1668, the said Mary Hale lying in her bed, a
good fire giving such light that one might see all over that room where the said Mary then was, the said Mary
heard a noise, &presently something fell on her legs with such violence that she feared it would have broken
her legs, and then it came upon her stomach and oppressed her so as if it would have pressed the breath out of
her body. Then appeared an ugly shaped thing like a dog, having a head such that I clearly and distinctly knew
to be the head of Katherine Harrison, who was lately imprisoned upon suspicion of witchcraft. Mary saw it
walk to &fro in the chamber and went to her father's bedside then came back and disappeared. That day seven
night next after, lying in her bed something came upon her in like manner as is formerly related, first on her
legs &feet &then on her stomach, crushing & oppressing her very sore. She put forth her hand to feel (because
there was no light in the room so as clearly to discern). Mary aforesaid felt a face, which she judged to be a
woman's face, presently then she had a great blow on her fingers which pained her 2 days after, which she
complained of to her father &mother, &made her fingers black and blue. During the former passages Mary
called to her father &mother but could not wake them till it was gone. After this, the day of December in the
night, (the night being very windy) something came again and spoke thus to her, saying to Mary aforesaid,
You said that I would not come again, but are you not afraid of me. Mary said, No.
The voice replied I will
make you afraid before I have done with you; and then presently Mary was crushed &oppressed very much.
Then Mary called often to her father and mother, they lying very near. Then the voice said, Though you do
call they shall not hear till I am gone. Then the voice said, You said that I preserved my cart to carry me to the
gallows, but I will make it a dear cart to you (which said words Mary remembered she had only spoke in
private to her sister a little before &to no other.) Mary replied she feared her not, because God had kept her
&would keep her still. The voice said she had a commission to kill her. Mary asked, Who gave you the
commission? The voice replied God gave me the commission. Mary replied, The Devil is a liar from the
beginning for God will not give commission to murder, therefore it must be from the devil. Then Mary was
again pressed very much. Then the voice said, You will make known these things abroad when I am gone, but
if you will promise me to keep these aforesaid matters secret I will come no more to afflict you. Mary replied
I will tell it abroad. Whereas the said Mary mentions divers times in this former writing that she heard a voice,
this said Mary affirmeth that she did &doth know that it was the voice of Katherine Harrison aforesaid; and
Mary aforesaid affirmeth that the substance of the whole relation is truth. Sworn in Court May 25, 1669.
Attest John Allyn, Sec'y.
Elizabeth Smith
Elizabeth the wife of Simon Smith of Thirty Mile Island testified that Catherine was noted by her and the
rest of the family to be a great or notorious liar, a sabbath breaker, and one that told fortunes, and told the said
Elizabeth her fortune, that her husband's name should be Simon; &also told the said Elizabeth some other
matters that did come to pass; and also would oft speak and boast of her great familiarity with Mr. Lilley, one
that told fortunes and foretold many matters that in furture times were to be accomplished. And also the said
Katherine did often spin so great a quantity of fine linen yarn as the said Elizabeth did never know nor hear of
any other woman that could spin so much. And further, the said Elizabeth said that Capt. Cullick observing
the evil conversation in word and deed of the said Katherine turned her out of his service, one reason was
because the said Katherine told fortunes. Taken upon oath Sept. 23, 1668 before John Allyn, Assistant.
On such evidence, October 12, 1669, the jury being called to give in their verdict upon the indictment of
Katherine Harrison, returned that they find the prisoner guilty of the indictment.
And meanwhile Katherine herself had not been idle even in durance. With a dignity becoming such a
communication, and in a desperate hope that justice and mercy might be meted out to her, she addressed a
petition to the court setting forth with unconscious pathos some of the wrongs and sufferings she had endured
in person and estate; and one may well understand why under such great provocation she told Michael
Griswold that he would hang her though he damned a thousand souls, and as for his own soul it was damned
long ago. Vigorous and emphatic words, for which perhaps Katherine was punished enough, as she was
adjudged to pay Michael in two actions for slander, L25 and costs in one and L15 and costs in the other.
This was Katherine's appeal:
Filed: Wid. Harrisons greuances presented to the court 6th of Octobr 1669.
A complaint of severall greiuances of the widow Harrisons which she desires the honored court to take
cognizance of and as far as maybe to give her reliefe in.
May it please this honored court, to have patience with mee a little: having none to complain to but the
Fathers of the Commonweale; and yet meetting with many injurys, which necessitate mee to look out for
some releeife. I am told to present you with these few lines, as a relation of the wrongs that I suffer, humbly
crauing your serious consideration of my state a widdow; of my wrongs, (wch I conceive are great) and that as
far as the rules of justice and equitie will allow, I may have right and a due recompence.
That that I would present to you in the first place is we had a yoke of oxen one of wch spoyled at our stile
before our doore, with blows upon the backe and side, so bruised that he was altogether unserviceable; about a
fortnight or three weeks after the former, we had a cow spoyled, her back broke and two of her ribs, nextly I
had a heifer in my barne yard, my ear mark of wch was cutt out and other ear marks set on; nextly I had a sow
that had young pigs ear marked (in the stie) after the same manner; nextly I had a cow at the side of my yard,
her jaw bone broke and one of her hoofs and a hole bored in her side, nextly I had a three yeare old heifer in
the meadow stuck with knife or some weapon and wounded to death; nextly I had a cow in the street wounded
in the bag as she stood before my door, in the street, nextly I had a sow went out into the woods, came home
with ears luged and one of her hind legs cutt offe, lastly my corne in Mile Meadow much damnified with
horses, they being staked upon it; it was wheat; All wch injurys, as they do sauor of enemy so I hope they will
be looked upon by this honored court according to their natuer and judged according to there demerit, that so
your poor suppliant may find some redrese; who is bold to subscribe.
Your servant and supplyant, KATHERINE HARRISON.
Postscript. I had my horse wounded in the night, as he was in my pasture no creature save thre calves
with him: More I had one two yeare old steer the back of it broke, in the barne yard, more I had a matter of 30
poles of hops cutt and spoyled; all wch things have hapened since my husband death, wch was last August
was two yeare. There is wittnes to the oxen Jonathan &Josiah Gillert; to the cows being spoyled, Enoch Buck,
Josiah Gilbert; to the cow that had her jaw bone broke, Dan, Rose, John, Bronson: to the heifer, one of
widdow Stodder sons, and Willia Taylor; to the corne John Beckly; to the wound of the horse Anthony
Wright, Goodman Higby; to the hops cutting, Goodwife Standish and Mary Wright; wch things being added,
and left to your serious consideration, I make bold again to subscribe.
Yours, KATHERINE HARRISON.
At a special court of assistants held May 20, 1670, to which the General Assembly had referred the matter
with power, the court having considered the verdict of the jury could not concur with them so as to sentence
her to death, but dismissed her from her imprisonment, she paying her just fees; willing her to mind the
fulfilment of removing from Wethersfield, which is that will tend most to her own safety &the contentment
of the people who are her neighbors.
In the same year, having paid the expenses of her trials and imprisonment, she removed to Westchester,
New York. Being under suspicion of witchcraft, her presence was unwelcome to the inhabitants there and
complaint was made to Governor Lovelace. She gave security for her civil carriage and good behavior, and at
the General Court of Assizes held in New York in October, 1670, in the case of Katherine Harrison, widow,
who was bound to the good behavior upon complaint of some of the inhabitants of Westchester, it was
ordered, that in regard there is nothing appears against her deserving the continuance of that obligation she is
to be released from it, &hath liberty to remain in the town of Westchester where she now resides, or anywhere
else in the government during her pleasure.
Back to start of Spirituality section
My Index Page
|