Tell Us More, Grandmother!

Korean “Comfort Women” Re/constructing and Re/presenting the “Truth” and Memory of Survival through Narratives

2009 thesis

This was a very interesting thesis that was done on a very personal level by the writer. She is an activist and interviewed women who had been comfort women. Below are some of the parts of the thesis that I thought were quite significant.

Among many of the issues that were related to my questions, the “Comfort Women” issue appeared to me as a very unique, heartbreaking research topic. I had vaguely known about it before, and the thought that women of my age several decades ago suffered something so horrifying and unimaginable made me upset about the tragic history of early 20th century Korea. In addition, I hated Japan for causing such a pain to “us.” It was the “Korean mentality” telling me that I should not like “them,” as I had been taught all my life to dislike Japan. Such sentiment was almost “natural” since at school and through the media, I was exposed to very patriarchal and patriotic discourses. The long enmity and nationalistic sentiments were not completely unreasonable. Japan had never appeared to be sincere for the aftermatters of colonialism, and Japan had not been willing to take responsibility for its war crimes. Such hatred against Japan (or rather, the idea of Japan) has always been an essential element of modern Korean identity.

So, I contacted the Korean Council for the Women Drafted for Military Sexual Slavery by Japan (the Korean Council, from here on) which is the primary advocacy organization for “Comfort Women.”

The military sexual slavery system imposed by Japan, or the “Comfort Women” system, during World War II was one of the most horrendous parts of human history and could be compared to the Holocaust against European Jews during the same period. Unfortunately, neither the “Comfort Women” system nor the cruelty of it are well-known outside of a few East Asian countries with survivors who bravely have come out in the last two decades. The system encompasses several broad issues anthropologically, including sexism, colonialism, nationalism, and most of all, power exercised through broader racial/ethnic and patriarchal systems.

After Japan took over Korea in 1910, the colonizer fully exploited Korea’s resources, especially labor. Korean people were often used as manual laborers producing war necessities, especially before and during the Second World War period between the late 1930s and 1945 as Japan was participating in the war full force.

While going into dangerous areas to earn money for their families, the women, who expected to participate in the manual labor for the war time production lines, did not have any idea about what kind of horrifying labor and suffering were waiting for them.

Statistical facts show how cruelly the women were treated. Initially the “Comfort Women” were Japanese sex workers who were employed to “entertain” soldiers. However, the limited number of Japanese prostitutes and their hesitation made the government gradually replace them with destitute women from the colonies.6 Ahn found a record showing that 80-90% of the slaves were Korean women while there were also women from various countries, such as Japan, Taiwan, China, the Philippines, Burma, the Netherlands and Australia.7 Since most of the records were destroyed around the time the war ended, it is very difficult to estimate exact or even the approximate numbers of “Comfort Women.” However, the sex slaves were derogatorily nicknamed “Ni-gyu-ichi” which means 29 to 1 in Japanese since each sex slave had to “receive” about 29 soldiers per day or per shift. Based on this, there were about 80,000 to 200,000 women who were sacrificed for military sexual slavery.

The “official” minimum age for the Japanese women was 18 and for the Korean women, 17, according to the data that Ahn found. Yet she claims there were many women who were much younger than 17 years old, like Ms. Lee Kyong-Sang, who testified that she was 12 years old when she had been dragged into the war as a “Comfort Woman.”

The Japanese government and military used many different methods to recruit the women. Many women were from poor rural families that struggled with daily survival. In addition, sons and males were much more valued assets than female children —culturally and economically— and therefore daughters were the ones forced into the “Voluntary Corps” so that their brothers did not have to join the Japanese military.

Many women eventually came to be involved in prostitution, and the recruiters — both private and governmental, Korean and Japanese— targeted these women.1They were transported in military trucks and ships and treated as military supplies while they were placed in a section with a sign saying, “Prohibited – Do not use in the ship” and they were addressed as “military purpose materials” in paperwork.

There are only 93 “Comfort Women” survivors left in Korea

Poverty drove some women into becoming comfort women. Apparently there was extreme poverty in Korea at that time.

She also mentions han, which is a culturally specific term for the internalized, inexpressible anger and sadness, as explained in the first chapter.

Q: If the Japanese government provides official reparation and apologizes, do you think you can forgive them?

L: There’s no “if.” I can’t forgive them until the Japanese Prime Minister Kneels down in front of me asking for forgiveness. There’s no “if.” That’s absurd. When I die, I’m going to be cremated. If he comes there after I die, I won’t forgive him. He has to do it while I’m alive. I’m a living proof regarding this history. This history has been dragged this far, and that’s why I’m still working. Japan still says that it never happened, and that makes them more unforgivable. As we think about our descendents… We cannot pass down this issue to them. We cannot pass down the pain. […] We are trying to finish it at our generation.

Some survivors “made choices” to follow “Comfort Women” brokers so that they could work and earn money for their destitute families (although it turned out that they did not earn any money), but they did not choose to be poor and be subjected to gruesome systematic sexual violence. They wanted to be independent, “modern” women by providing for themselves, but such illusions were exploited by the colonizers who, in turn, exploited the women.

Even though, in the early 90s, military sexual slavery was proved as a crime committed against Koreans during the Pacific War, the textbook for high school during that period, which was written and published by the Ministry of Education (therefore reflecting the national agenda), did not include more than a few sentences regarding “Comfort Women.”

Several thousands of women gave their consent, yet it was not really their choice because they were living in extreme systemic violence that did not allow women to develop any sort of agency.



Main Index
Japan main page
Japanese-American Internment Camps index page
Japan and World War II index page